N※N

Armstrong testifies on transportation infrastructure as Congress prepares for new highway funding bill

In a significant development for transportation policy in the United States, Congressman Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota recently testified before a congressional committee as lawmakers prepare to draft a new highway funding bill. This testimony, delivered in the context of ongoing discussions about infrastructure investment, highlights the critical role of transportation networks in supporting economic growth, public safety, and community connectivity, particularly in rural states like North Dakota. Armstrong’s remarks underscored the unique challenges faced by states with vast rural landscapes and the urgent need for federal support to maintain and improve transportation infrastructure. His testimony comes at a pivotal moment as Congress works to address the nation’s aging infrastructure and ensure sustainable funding mechanisms for highways, bridges, and other vital transportation systems.

Armstrong emphasized that transportation infrastructure is the backbone of North Dakota’s economy, which heavily relies on agriculture, energy production, and trade. He pointed out that the state’s farmers, ranchers, and energy workers depend on a reliable network of roads and highways to transport goods to market, access supplies, and connect with broader supply chains. Without adequate infrastructure, these industries face significant delays, increased costs, and reduced competitiveness in national and global markets. Armstrong painted a vivid picture of the challenges faced by rural communities, where long distances between towns and limited access to major interstates can exacerbate the impact of poorly maintained roads. He argued that federal investment in transportation is not just a matter of convenience but a critical component of economic survival for many North Dakotans.

One of the central themes of Armstrong’s testimony was the disparity in infrastructure funding and attention between urban and rural areas. He noted that while urban centers often receive significant federal and state resources for public transit, highways, and other projects, rural states like North Dakota are frequently overlooked despite their outsized contributions to the national economy through food and energy production. Armstrong highlighted that the cost of maintaining roads in rural areas is often higher per capita due to lower population densities and the vast distances that must be covered. Harsh weather conditions, including severe winters and flooding, further strain infrastructure in states like North Dakota, leading to faster deterioration of roads and bridges. He urged Congress to consider these unique challenges when crafting the new highway funding bill, advocating for a funding formula that ensures equitable distribution of resources to rural states.

Armstrong also addressed the importance of infrastructure in ensuring public safety. He pointed out that poorly maintained roads and bridges pose significant risks to motorists, particularly in rural areas where emergency response times can be longer due to geographic isolation. He cited examples of crumbling bridges and pothole-ridden highways in North Dakota that have led to accidents and delays in critical situations. Improving transportation infrastructure, he argued, is not just an economic issue but a matter of life and death for many residents who rely on these roads daily. Armstrong called for targeted investments in safety improvements, such as better signage, guardrails, and bridge repairs, to protect travelers and reduce the burden on local governments that often lack the resources to address these issues independently.

Another key point in Armstrong’s testimony was the need for sustainable and long-term funding solutions for transportation infrastructure. He expressed concern about the uncertainty surrounding the Highway Trust Fund, which has historically been the primary source of federal funding for highway and transit projects. The fund, which relies on revenue from federal gas taxes, has faced chronic shortfalls in recent years due to declining fuel tax revenues as vehicles become more fuel-efficient and alternative energy sources gain traction. Armstrong stressed that Congress must find innovative ways to replenish the fund or identify alternative revenue streams to ensure that states can plan and execute infrastructure projects without the constant threat of funding disruptions. He suggested exploring options such as public-private partnerships, user fees, and increased federal appropriations to create a more stable financial foundation for transportation projects.

In addition to funding challenges, Armstrong highlighted the importance of streamlining regulatory processes to expedite infrastructure projects. He noted that bureaucratic delays and excessive red tape often hinder the ability of states and local governments to address urgent transportation needs. For example, environmental reviews and permitting processes can take years, delaying critical repairs and upgrades while costs continue to rise. Armstrong advocated for reforms that would maintain necessary oversight while reducing unnecessary delays, allowing states like North Dakota to make faster progress on projects that directly benefit their communities. He emphasized that efficiency in project delivery is just as important as securing funding, as prolonged delays can erode public trust in government’s ability to address infrastructure challenges.

Armstrong also took the opportunity to discuss the role of technology and innovation in modernizing transportation infrastructure. He pointed out that advancements such as smart highways, improved traffic management systems, and the integration of electric vehicle charging stations could play a transformative role in enhancing the efficiency and sustainability of transportation networks. However, he cautioned that rural states often lack the resources and expertise to adopt these technologies at scale without federal support. He urged Congress to include provisions in the highway funding bill that would provide grants or technical assistance to help rural areas keep pace with technological advancements, ensuring that the benefits of innovation are not limited to urban centers.

Furthermore, Armstrong connected the issue of transportation infrastructure to broader national priorities, including energy independence and food security. He explained that North Dakota’s role as a leading producer of oil, natural gas, and agricultural products means that its transportation networks have implications far beyond state borders. Efficient roads and highways in North Dakota enable the timely delivery of energy resources and food supplies to other parts of the country, supporting national economic stability. Armstrong argued that investing in the state’s infrastructure is an investment in the nation as a whole, as it strengthens the supply chains that underpin critical industries. He called on his congressional colleagues to view rural infrastructure not as a local issue but as a vital component of America’s economic and security framework.

In his closing remarks, Armstrong reiterated the urgency of passing a comprehensive highway funding bill that addresses the diverse needs of states across the country. He emphasized that infrastructure is not a partisan issue but a shared responsibility that requires bipartisan cooperation to achieve meaningful results. He expressed hope that Congress would seize the opportunity to create a bill that prioritizes both urban and rural needs, ensures long-term funding stability, and incorporates innovative solutions to modernize transportation systems. Armstrong’s testimony served as a powerful reminder of the interconnectedness of America’s infrastructure and the importance of federal leadership in maintaining the roads, bridges, and highways that keep the nation moving.

In conclusion, Congressman Kelly Armstrong’s testimony before Congress provided a compelling case for increased federal investment in transportation infrastructure, with a particular focus on the unique challenges faced by rural states like North Dakota. His remarks highlighted the economic, safety, and national security implications of a well-maintained transportation network, while also addressing the need for equitable funding, regulatory reform, and technological innovation. As Congress prepares to draft a new highway funding bill, Armstrong’s insights offer a valuable perspective on the critical role of infrastructure in supporting communities and driving economic growth. His advocacy for rural states underscores the importance of ensuring that all regions of the country have access to the resources they need to build and maintain the transportation systems that are essential to their livelihoods. Through his testimony, Armstrong has contributed to a broader national conversation about the future of infrastructure, urging lawmakers to prioritize this issue and work together to create lasting solutions.

Read the Full KFYR TV Article at:
[ https://www.kfyrtv.com/2025/07/16/armstrong-testifies-transportation-infrastructure-congress-prepares-new-highway-funding-bill/ ]