N※N

Sports and Competition
Source : (remove) : Dezeen
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Sports and Competition
Source : (remove) : Dezeen
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Geert Wilders swaps coalition politics for Mario Kart

Geert Wilders Swaps Coalition Politics for a Shot at Power in the Netherlands

In a stunning turn of events that underscores the volatile nature of Dutch politics, far-right leader Geert Wilders has announced he will not become the next prime minister of the Netherlands, despite his Party for Freedom (PVV) securing the most seats in last November's general election. This decision, revealed late Wednesday, paves the way for a potential right-wing coalition government but highlights the deep divisions and compromises required to form a stable administration in one of Europe's most fragmented political landscapes.

Wilders, a firebrand politician known for his anti-Islam rhetoric and Eurosceptic views, has long been a polarizing figure in Dutch politics. His party's victory in the November 22, 2023, election sent shockwaves across Europe, with the PVV winning 37 seats in the 150-seat lower house of parliament – a significant jump from the 17 seats it held previously. This result positioned Wilders as a kingmaker, but forming a government has proven arduous. For months, coalition negotiations have dragged on, involving potential partners like the center-right People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), the conservative New Social Contract (NSC), and the agrarian Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB). Together, these parties command a slim majority of 88 seats, but ideological clashes and personal animosities have repeatedly threatened to derail talks.

The breakthrough came after Wilders, in a post on X (formerly Twitter), stated: "I can only become prime minister if all parties in the coalition support it. That wasn't the case." He expressed disappointment but emphasized his commitment to the greater good, adding, "I want a right-wing cabinet. Less asylum and immigration. Dutch people first." This concession is seen as a pragmatic move to salvage the coalition, as key partners, particularly the NSC led by Pieter Omtzigt, have been vocal about their reluctance to serve under Wilders due to his controversial past statements and policies.

To understand this development, it's essential to delve into Wilders' political journey. Born in 1963 in Venlo, a town near the German border, Wilders began his career in the VVD but broke away in 2004 over disagreements on Turkey's EU accession. He founded the PVV in 2006, building a platform centered on curbing immigration, especially from Muslim-majority countries, and protecting Dutch identity. Over the years, Wilders has faced numerous legal battles, including a 2016 conviction for inciting discrimination after leading a chant against Moroccans at a rally. His rhetoric has drawn comparisons to figures like Marine Le Pen in France or Viktor Orbán in Hungary, positioning him as a key player in Europe's rising populist wave.

The 2023 election was triggered by the collapse of Prime Minister Mark Rutte's fourth cabinet in July over immigration policy disputes. Rutte, who had led the Netherlands since 2010, announced his retirement from politics, creating a vacuum that Wilders exploited masterfully. Campaigning on promises to slash immigration, boost welfare for native Dutch, and challenge EU regulations, Wilders tapped into widespread discontent over housing shortages, inflation, and cultural shifts. His victory was particularly resonant in rural and working-class areas, where voters felt overlooked by the urban elite in The Hague.

However, translating electoral success into governance has been Wilders' Achilles' heel. In previous elections, such as 2010 when the PVV supported a minority government, coalitions involving him have been short-lived and unstable. This time, the negotiations have been overseen by a series of informateurs – neutral figures appointed to facilitate talks. The latest, Kim Putters, a former head of the Social and Economic Council, played a pivotal role in brokering the current agreement. Putters' report, expected to be presented to parliament soon, outlines a framework for a "program cabinet" – a hybrid model where ministers could include non-parliamentarians, allowing for technocratic expertise while maintaining political oversight.

Under this setup, the coalition would focus on key priorities: drastically reducing asylum seekers, tightening border controls, and reforming agricultural policies to appease the BBB's farmer base. Wilders has already moderated some of his more extreme positions, such as banning mosques or the Quran, to make the PVV more palatable to partners. Yet, critics argue this is mere window dressing. "Wilders may not be prime minister, but his influence will permeate every policy," said Sophie in 't Veld, a liberal MEP, in a recent interview. Opposition parties, including the left-leaning GroenLinks-PvdA alliance led by Frans Timmermans, have decried the coalition as a "capitulation to extremism," warning it could erode the Netherlands' reputation as a tolerant, progressive nation.

The implications extend beyond Dutch borders. The Netherlands, a founding EU member and home to institutions like the International Court of Justice, has often been a bellwether for European trends. A Wilders-influenced government could embolden similar movements in upcoming elections in countries like France, Germany, and Austria. It might also complicate EU decision-making on issues like migration pacts or Ukraine aid, given Wilders' skepticism toward Brussels. Analysts point to parallels with Sweden, where the far-right Sweden Democrats support a center-right government without holding ministerial posts, exerting influence from the sidelines.

Reactions within the Netherlands have been mixed. Supporters of Wilders view his sacrifice as heroic, a sign of maturity that prioritizes national interest over personal ambition. "Finally, someone putting the people first," tweeted a PVV voter from Rotterdam. Detractors, however, see it as a tactical retreat, allowing Wilders to pull strings without bearing direct responsibility. Protests have already erupted in Amsterdam and Utrecht, with demonstrators chanting against what they call a "fascist takeover."

Looking ahead, the coalition's formation is not yet guaranteed. Parliament must approve the agreement, and internal party votes could still scuttle it. If successful, a new prime minister – possibly from the VVD or NSC – would be sworn in by King Willem-Alexander, potentially as early as June. Wilders, meanwhile, is likely to remain a parliamentary force, perhaps as a faction leader or advisor, ensuring his agenda stays front and center.

This episode reflects broader challenges in multiparty democracies, where electoral winners must often dilute their platforms to govern. For Wilders, who has spent decades on the fringes, this could mark the culmination of his quest for relevance – or the beginning of a precarious balancing act. As Europe grapples with populism, the Dutch experiment will be watched closely, offering lessons on whether far-right ideas can be mainstreamed without fracturing societal cohesion.

In the end, Wilders' decision to step aside might not diminish his power but redefine it. By swapping the premiership for coalition influence, he ensures his voice echoes in the corridors of power, reshaping the Netherlands in ways that could reverberate for years to come. As one political commentator put it, "Wilders isn't disappearing; he's just changing the game." The coming months will reveal whether this gamble pays off or unravels under the weight of compromise.

Read the Full The Telegraph Article at:
[ https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/geert-wilders-swaps-coalition-politics-070000457.html ]