N※N

West Virginia Predicted to Dominate Wake Forest with 78-68 Victory

70

  //sports-competition.news-articles.net/content/2 .. -to-dominate-wake-forest-with-78-68-victory.html
  Published in Sports and Competition on Saturday, December 6th 2025 at 8:24 GMT by Sports Illustrated

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-06 179 x 224 / 17309 Bytes

2025-12-06 224 x 224 / 18850 Bytes

2025-12-06 224 x 224 / 12731 Bytes

2025-12-06 224 x 224 / 20038 Bytes

West Virginia vs. Wake Forest: What the Numbers and the Experts Say About the Final Score

When the Big 12’s West Virginia Mountaineers host the ACC’s Wake Forest Demon Deacons, the stakes are high for both programs. With the Mountaineers riding a surge of momentum from a 21‑7 record and Wake Forest languishing at 9‑15, the matchup feels like a “good‑team‑vs‑bad‑team” scenario—but the reality is far more nuanced. A recent Sports Illustrated piece, “Predicting the Final Score for West Virginia’s Clash with Wake Forest,” digs into the data, the recent form, and the human factors that will decide the outcome. Below is a concise, 500‑plus‑word recap of that analysis, including additional context from the linked stories in the original article.

1. The Context of the Game

The Mountaineers (23‑8, 12‑6 in conference play) are chasing a chance to cement themselves in the upper tier of the Big 12 and secure a favorable seed in the conference tournament. Coach Dave Hartley’s squad has been praised for its tenacious defense and efficient floor spacing, especially on the perimeter. In contrast, Wake Forest (10‑15, 4‑12) has struggled to maintain consistency on offense, often stalling in the paint and showing a susceptibility to big‑ball rebounding.

The game’s setting—Baylor’s McDermott Center in Waco, Texas—offers a neutral‑site feel, but the Mountaineers have the advantage of a fan base that frequently fills the arena and an “at‑home” feel due to the proximity of the university’s campus. The article notes that this is the first meeting between the two programs since 2017, when Wake Forest won 74‑70 in Morgantown. That game remains a reference point for both coaching staffs.

2. Key Statistical Drivers

The table mirrors the article’s emphasis on rebounding and defensive efficiency as the primary differentiators. West Virginia’s 41.5 RPG—ranked 12th in the NCAA—coupled with a 106.7 defensive efficiency rating, suggests that the Mountaineers will impose their will on Wake Forest’s offense. Meanwhile, Wake Forest’s higher turnover rate points to potential for WVU to capitalize on fast‑break opportunities.

3. Player Spotlight

West Virginia: - Jordan Rondo – The senior guard averages 13.6 points and 5.1 assists per game, leading the team in floor‑spacing and decision‑making. His free‑throw percentage (84.7%) is also a critical factor in close games. - Keelan McIntosh – The junior forward brings size to the paint, averaging 11.9 points and 7.2 rebounds per game. His rebounding prowess is a direct threat to Wake Forest’s interior presence. - R.J. Smith – The rookie forward adds a 4‑by‑4 defensive presence and can stretch the floor with his 3‑point shooting, which sits at 38%.

Wake Forest: - Jalen Smith – Returning from a fractured foot, Smith is back at 18.4 points and 8.2 rebounds per game. His absence in the previous 13 games had been a major drag on Wake Forest’s interior play. - Dwayne Washington – A 7‑foot center who can anchor the defense, Washington posts 6.4 blocks per game and averages 11.2 points. - Marcus Davis – The guard’s 45% three‑point shooting will test West Virginia’s perimeter defense.

The article highlights how Jalen Smith’s return could swing the rebounding contest, but still argues that West Virginia’s depth will counteract any single‑player advantage.

4. Recent Form and Momentum

West Virginia’s recent win streak is an essential part of the predictive model. The Mountaineers entered the game after defeating Kansas State 83‑73 in a high‑pressure matchup, displaying a 15‑point margin that the article credits to their defensive schemes. They also beat Texas Tech 78‑72 two games earlier, further cementing the notion that West Virginia can win close, defense‑heavy contests.

Wake Forest, on the other hand, has been on a 5‑game losing streak, their last win being a 76‑70 victory over Clemson. The article points out that Wake Forest’s offense has been inconsistent, with a 3‑point field‑goal percentage that fluctuates dramatically from game to game. This volatility is seen as a risk factor for their upcoming matchup.

5. Predictive Models and Forecast

The Sports Illustrated piece references three forecasting models that all converge on a WVU win:

1. The “Defense‑First” Model – Weighs defensive efficiency heavily, predicting a 78‑68 victory for West Virginia.
2. The “Rebound‑Centric” Model – Focuses on rebounding margin, projecting a 77‑66 final score.
3. The “Player‑Impact” Model – Accounts for key player absences and returns, yielding a 79‑69 estimate.

The article explains that each model’s underlying assumptions share common threads: West Virginia’s defensive stoutness, a rebounding advantage, and Wake Forest’s recent offensive slump. The final consensus prediction settles on a 78‑68 win for West Virginia, a 10‑point margin that balances statistical realism with the unpredictability inherent in college basketball.

6. The Human Element: Coaching and Strategy

While the data may point to a WVU advantage, the article underscores that coaching strategies will play a decisive role. Dave Hartley’s decision to play a “high‑pressure, full‑court” defense against Wake Forest could force a higher turnover rate. Meanwhile, Wake Forest’s Ben Howland will likely lean on Jalen Smith’s post play, hoping to disrupt WVU’s interior defense.

The article also quotes a former WVU player who played for Wake Forest, noting that the Demon Deacons’ “tight ball‑handling” is their biggest asset, which could mitigate West Virginia’s defensive aggression if executed flawlessly.

7. Final Takeaway

In sum, the Sports Illustrated article paints a picture of a game that, on paper, favors West Virginia. Their superior defensive efficiency, rebounding edge, and recent positive trajectory set the stage for a 10‑point victory. Wake Forest’s return of a key player adds intrigue, but the Mountaineers’ depth and strategic emphasis on defense appear to tilt the scales.

For fans, the game promises a showcase of West Virginia’s disciplined playstyle, balanced by Wake Forest’s spirited, albeit inconsistent, offense. Whether the 78‑68 prediction holds true will depend on execution, foul management, and the ever‑volatile nature of college basketball. Either way, the Mountaineers’ pursuit of conference prestige and the Demon Deacons’ quest for a resurgence will make the matchup a must‑watch event for the Big 12 and ACC alike.