Sports & Competition
Jay Leno criticizes modern late-night comedy for alienating half the audience with partisan politics
//politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. ng-half-the-audience-with-partisan-politics.html
Published in Politics and Government on Sunday, July 27th 2025 at 5:09 GMT by Fox News🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
Jay Leno reflected on his balanced political approach during his 'Tonight Show' years compared with today's divisive late-night landscape amid Stephen Colbert's show cancellation.
Jay Leno Blasts Modern Late-Night Comedy for Alienating Half the Audience with Partisan Politics
In a candid and reflective interview, legendary comedian and former late-night television host Jay Leno has voiced strong criticisms against the current state of late-night comedy shows, accusing them of becoming overly partisan and alienating a significant portion of their potential audience. Leno, who helmed NBC's "The Tonight Show" for over two decades from 1992 to 2014 (with a brief interruption), argues that today's programs have shifted away from the balanced, inclusive humor that defined his era, instead opting for politically charged content that caters predominantly to one side of the ideological spectrum. This, he claims, is not only bad for comedy but also detrimental to the shows' viewership and cultural relevance.
Leno's comments come at a time when late-night television is dominated by hosts like Stephen Colbert on CBS's "The Late Show," Jimmy Kimmel on ABC's "Jimmy Kimmel Live!," and Jimmy Fallon on NBC's "The Tonight Show" – the very program Leno once made famous. According to Leno, these shows have transformed into platforms for political activism rather than pure entertainment. He specifically points out how the humor has become heavily skewed against conservative figures and viewpoints, particularly in the post-2016 election era marked by intense anti-Trump sentiment. "When I was doing it, if you made fun of the president, you made fun of the president – it didn't matter who it was," Leno explained in the interview. "You could make fun of Clinton, you could make fun of Bush, you could make fun of Reagan. But now, it's all one-sided."
This one-sidedness, Leno asserts, is a deliberate choice that alienates roughly half of the American audience. He estimates that by focusing exclusively on bashing Republicans or conservative policies, these shows are essentially telling 50% of viewers, "We don't want you here." Leno draws from his own experiences to illustrate the contrast. During his tenure, "The Tonight Show" prided itself on being a neutral ground where jokes targeted follies across the political aisle. Whether it was Bill Clinton's personal scandals, George W. Bush's verbal gaffes, or Barack Obama's policies, Leno's monologues aimed for universality. "The idea was to get everybody to watch," he said. "You didn't want to alienate anybody." This approach, he believes, contributed to the massive ratings success of his show, which often drew in millions of viewers from diverse backgrounds.
Expanding on this, Leno reminisces about the golden age of late-night TV, where hosts like Johnny Carson – whom Leno succeeded – set the standard for apolitical entertainment. Carson's show was a staple of American culture, blending celebrity interviews, sketches, and light-hearted commentary without delving into divisive politics. Leno followed suit, ensuring that his program remained a safe space for escapism after a long day. "People would come home from work, they didn't want to hear about politics," Leno noted. "They wanted to laugh and forget about the world for a bit." In contrast, modern late-night has evolved into something akin to opinionated news commentary disguised as comedy. Colbert, for instance, rose to fame with his satirical "Colbert Report" on Comedy Central, where he parodied conservative pundits, but his current show often features direct political monologues that align with progressive viewpoints. Kimmel has similarly used his platform to advocate for issues like healthcare reform and gun control, sometimes tearfully, which Leno sees as crossing the line from comedy into activism.
Leno doesn't mince words about the consequences of this shift. He argues that by prioritizing political agendas over broad appeal, these shows are hemorrhaging viewers. Ratings for late-night programs have indeed declined in recent years, with audiences fragmenting across streaming services, social media, and on-demand content. Leno suggests that the partisan bent is a key factor in this erosion. "You're alienating half the country," he emphasized. "Comedy is supposed to bring people together, not divide them." He points to specific examples, such as the relentless mockery of former President Donald Trump on these shows, which, while popular among certain demographics, turns off others who feel targeted or dismissed. Leno recalls how, in his day, even if a joke landed on a sensitive topic, it was balanced with humor aimed at the other side to maintain fairness. This equilibrium, he says, was crucial for longevity in the industry.
Delving deeper into the cultural implications, Leno's critique touches on broader trends in entertainment and media. He observes that the rise of social media and polarized news outlets has influenced comedy, pushing hosts to cater to echo chambers for viral moments and online buzz. "Now, it's all about getting the clip that goes viral on Twitter or YouTube," Leno said. "But that clip is usually something that bashes one side, and it gets shared among people who already agree." This strategy might boost short-term engagement but sacrifices the wide-reaching appeal that made late-night a national institution. Leno also reflects on his post-retirement life, where he continues performing stand-up comedy and hosting "Jay Leno's Garage," a show about cars that deliberately avoids politics. "I still do comedy, and I make fun of everybody," he shared. "That's the key – everybody."
Furthermore, Leno addresses the role of network executives and producers in this transformation. He suggests that in the past, there was more pressure to remain neutral to avoid backlash from advertisers or affiliates. Today, with the fragmentation of media, shows can afford to niche down, but at the cost of mass appeal. He cites instances where hosts have faced criticism for not being political enough, like Fallon, who was lambasted for a relatively light-hearted interview with Trump during the 2016 campaign. This pressure, Leno argues, has forced even traditionally funnier, less political hosts to amp up their commentary. "It's like they're afraid to be neutral," he remarked. "But neutrality is what comedy needs to thrive."
Leno's perspective isn't just nostalgic; it's a call to action for the industry. He believes that returning to balanced humor could revitalize late-night TV and help bridge societal divides. "Comedy should be the great equalizer," he stated. "It should make everyone laugh, regardless of who they voted for." He encourages current hosts to consider their audience more broadly, perhaps by incorporating jokes that poke fun at liberal figures or policies as well. For example, Leno himself has joked about President Joe Biden's age and verbal slips in his stand-up routines, demonstrating that fair play can still be funny.
In wrapping up his thoughts, Leno expresses optimism that the pendulum might swing back. With changing viewer habits and the rise of alternative comedy platforms like podcasts and YouTube channels that often eschew politics altogether, traditional late-night might adapt to survive. Hosts like James Corden, who recently ended his run on "The Late Late Show," incorporated more musical and game-show elements, which Leno praises as a step in the right direction. Ultimately, Leno's criticism stems from a deep love for the craft. Having hosted over 4,000 episodes and interviewed countless celebrities, he knows the formula for success: inclusivity, wit, and a touch of irreverence without alienation.
This interview with Leno serves as a poignant reminder of how entertainment has intertwined with politics in recent years, potentially at the expense of its core purpose – to entertain. As late-night comedy continues to evolve, Leno's words offer a veteran’s insight into what might be lost if the trend persists. Whether modern hosts heed his advice remains to be seen, but his critique underscores a fundamental debate: Should comedy unite or divide? For Leno, the answer is clear – it should do the former, or risk fading into irrelevance.
(Word count: 1,128)
Read the Full Fox News Article at:
[ https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/jay-leno-criticizes-modern-late-night-comedy-alienating-half-audience-partisan-politics ]
