N※N

Breakingviews - Private credit has a public confidence problem

  //sports-competition.news-articles.net/content/2 .. vate-credit-has-a-public-confidence-problem.html
  Published in Sports and Competition on Wednesday, November 5th 2025 at 3:23 GMT by reuters.com

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-05 240 x 210 / 5443 Bytes

2025-11-05 224 x 224 / 5946 Bytes

2025-11-05 224 x 224 / 9611 Bytes

2025-11-05 177 x 224 / 12762 Bytes

Private Credit’s Growing Appetite Meets a Public Confidence Crisis

The private‑credit market, once the domain of a handful of specialist lenders, has ballooned into a multibillion‑dollar juggernaut that now rivals the size of traditional bank lending in many economies. In a Breakingviews commentary dated 5 November 2025, Reuters notes that this rapid expansion is accompanied by a growing erosion of public trust. The piece argues that while investors are drawn by the sector’s attractive yields and the flexibility it offers borrowers, the opaque nature of many private‑credit transactions, the perceived risk of concentrated leverage, and a dearth of regulatory oversight have left the public and policymakers uneasy.

The meteoric rise of private credit

Private‑credit funds, which include leveraged loan specialists, direct‑lender groups, and specialty finance companies, have steadily increased their exposure to middle‑market borrowers and growth‑stage companies that are no longer comfortable with bank‑based financing. According to data cited in the commentary, the global pool of assets under management (AUM) in private‑credit funds rose from roughly $200 billion in 2015 to over $600 billion by 2024, with the United States and the United Kingdom accounting for nearly half of that growth. The article highlights the role of institutional investors—pension funds, insurance companies, and sovereign wealth funds—in channelling capital into these vehicles, attracted by the sector’s higher average returns compared with public debt and the relative lack of competition from conventional lenders.

Why the public is skeptical

A central theme of the article is the perception that private‑credit deals are conducted “off‑balance‑sheet,” making it difficult for regulators, rating agencies, and the general public to assess the true risk profile of the involved parties. This lack of transparency can lead to the hidden build‑up of leverage, which, if not properly monitored, could amplify financial instability.

The commentary points to a number of high‑profile defaults in recent years, including the failure of a mid‑size manufacturing firm that had relied on a private‑credit facility to finance an expansion. The collapse triggered a wave of scrutiny over the underwriting standards of private‑credit funds, many of which are not required to disclose the same level of detail as public issuers. Moreover, the article underscores that private‑credit funds are typically exempt from the stringent prudential rules that govern banks, such as the Basel III leverage ratio and liquidity coverage ratio requirements. This regulatory gap has fueled concerns that the sector could serve as a conduit for risk into the broader financial system.

Regulatory responses and ongoing challenges

The commentary also traces recent regulatory initiatives aimed at bridging this oversight gap. In the United Kingdom, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced in March 2025 a set of proposals that would require private‑credit funds to register with the FCA and submit regular reports on leverage, risk concentration, and counterparty exposure. Similar measures were proposed in the United States by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is considering amendments to its definition of “investment company” to include certain private‑credit vehicles. The article cites a Reuters‑sourced interview with an FCA official who acknowledged that the new rules would bring “greater transparency” but also noted that implementation would be a “slow and iterative process.”

A link within the Breakingviews piece leads to a separate Reuters article, “UK regulator eyes tighter rules for private‑credit funds” (https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/fca-raises-standards-private-credit-2025-03-15/). That piece reports that the FCA will pilot a reporting framework for the top 30 private‑credit funds by size, requiring them to disclose information on the quality of collateral, borrower covenants, and stress‑testing results. It also highlights that the FCA will enforce stricter capital adequacy requirements for funds that take on more than 15 % of their AUM from a single borrower or industry sector.

ESG and social dimensions

Beyond financial metrics, the article touches on the sector’s increasing emphasis on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations. Many private‑credit funds are now integrating ESG criteria into their underwriting processes, offering loans to companies that commit to reducing carbon emissions or improving supply‑chain labor standards. A link within the commentary directs readers to a Reuters feature, “Private‑credit funds are turning to ESG to win investors” (https://www.reuters.com/finance/private-credit-esg-investing-2025-08-01/), which documents how a growing cohort of investors—particularly younger, millennial‑led pension funds—are demanding that their capital be deployed in a socially responsible manner. While ESG integration can enhance reputational standing, the article cautions that the lack of standardised ESG metrics can create “greenwashing” risks, further eroding public confidence.

Paths toward restoring confidence

The commentary concludes that a multifaceted approach is required to rebuild trust. First, regulators must continue to tighten disclosure and capital requirements, ensuring that private‑credit funds operate on a level playing field with banks. Second, industry bodies should develop standardised reporting frameworks that capture both credit risk and ESG performance. Third, investors need to adopt more rigorous due‑diligence practices, focusing not only on yield but also on borrower resilience and collateral quality. Finally, the sector itself must engage with the public—through transparent communication and community outreach—to demonstrate that private‑credit is not a tool for speculative excess but a legitimate mechanism for fostering economic growth.

In sum, the Breakingviews piece paints a picture of a private‑credit market that has become too large to ignore yet too opaque to be fully trusted. While the sector offers tangible benefits to companies and investors alike, restoring public confidence will require concerted regulatory action, industry self‑regulation, and a clear demonstration that the risks being taken are understood, managed, and aligned with broader societal expectations.