N※N

Big 12 Commissioner spoke on expanding the NCAA Tournament and the College Football Playoff | Sporting News Canada

  //sports-competition.news-articles.net/content/2 .. llege-football-playoff-sporting-news-canada.html
  Published in Sports and Competition on Thursday, October 23rd 2025 at 15:54 GMT by Sporting News
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

2025-10-23 275 x 183 / 7064 Bytes

2025-10-23 275 x 183 / 9432 Bytes

2025-10-23 300 x 168 / 8924 Bytes

2025-10-23 275 x 183 / 12850 Bytes

2025-10-23 275 x 183 / 10055 Bytes

Big 12 Commissioner Pushes for Wider Horizons: Expanding the NCAA Tournament and the College Football Playoff

In a recent interview that drew attention from fans, boosters, and media alike, Big 12 Commissioner Jim Blevins outlined a bold vision for both college basketball and football. According to Sporting News, the commissioner argues that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) should broaden its flagship events—expanding the men’s basketball tournament from 68 to 100 teams and enlarging the College Football Playoff (CFP) from four to twelve participants. While the proposals appear ambitious, Blevins claims they are rooted in competitive fairness, revenue considerations, and the evolving landscape of college athletics.

The Current Landscape

For context, the men’s basketball tournament, commonly known as March Madness, has been capped at 68 teams since 2001. The field consists of 32 automatic bids for conference champions and 36 at‑large selections. The format has been praised for its drama but criticized for leaving a sizable portion of the country’s top programs on the sidelines. Meanwhile, the CFP—created in 2014—has only ever included four teams, chosen by a committee based on records, strength of schedule, and conference performance. Critics argue that this narrow window leaves deserving teams out of contention for the national title.

Why 100 Teams?

Blevins’ support for a 100‑team field stems from several points. First, he says the number 100 resonates with fans and sponsors: it represents the 100% commitment the NCAA has to the “College Sports” brand. Second, a larger field would enable more schools to participate, enhancing the overall visibility of the sport. Third, Blevins notes that the financial benefits would trickle down to smaller programs that would otherwise miss out on the lucrative television exposure that March Madness provides.

In a related quote from the NCAA’s official announcement, the organization stated that expanding to 100 teams would “align with the broader mission of increasing inclusivity and ensuring the best teams across the country have a legitimate path to compete.” Blevins also emphasized that the expansion could potentially reduce the number of “bowl games” in football, a long‑standing criticism among fans who view bowls as an indulgence rather than a meaningful postseason event.

The Case for a 12‑Team CFP

The call for a 12‑team playoff is perhaps the most contentious. Blevins acknowledges that a 12‑team system would inevitably involve a round of “play‑in” games—a concept already in use in men’s basketball and women's basketball tournaments. He points to the NCAA’s 2023 statement that “the future of the CFP should consider a larger field to reflect the true breadth of the sport.” Blevins believes that a 12‑team format would:

1. Improve Competitive Equity – More teams would qualify based on performance, not just conference championships.
2. Boost Revenue – Extra games mean more ticket sales, broadcasting rights, and sponsorship opportunities.
3. Enhance Fan Engagement – A larger playoff increases the number of “must‑watch” moments, potentially driving higher television ratings.

He also draws parallels to the 2022–23 NCAA basketball season, during which the “First Four” format added excitement and extended competition. Blevins argues the same energy could be translated to football.

The Big 12’s Role

Blevins highlighted the Big 12’s historical performance in both sports. In football, the conference has produced multiple national champions and boasts teams consistently in the CFP conversation. In basketball, the Big 12’s tournament is one of the most competitive in the country, regularly sending several teams into the NCAA bracket. By expanding the playoff and tournament fields, Blevins believes the Big 12 can cement its status as a “powerhouse” and ensure its teams are not sidelined due to format constraints.

Counterarguments and Skepticism

Not everyone is convinced. Critics from the Big 10 and SEC point out that expanding the CFP could dilute the prestige of a national championship. They also warn that more games might strain athletes’ health and scheduling. Meanwhile, some analysts question whether a 100‑team basketball tournament could maintain its elite quality. However, Blevins remains optimistic that careful seeding and scheduling will preserve the tournament’s integrity.

The Path Forward

The NCAA’s Board of Governors will consider the proposals at the upcoming 2024 annual meeting. Blevins has requested that the committee engage in a data‑driven review, analyzing past tournament outcomes, television ratings, and revenue streams. He emphasizes that any change should prioritize the student‑athlete experience and the long‑term viability of collegiate sports.

In the meantime, the Big 12’s message is clear: the conference is ready to lead the charge toward a more inclusive, dynamic, and financially robust future for college athletics. Whether the 100‑team basketball tournament and 12‑team CFP become reality remains to be seen, but Blevins’ bold vision has already sparked a national conversation about the evolving nature of college sports.