Tue, January 20, 2026
Mon, January 19, 2026
Sun, January 18, 2026

Texas: Stability Over Aggressive Moves

The Texas Powerhouses: Stability vs. Ambition

University of Texas: The Longhorns, consistently ranked amongst the nation's elite, have adopted a strategy of measured stability. Rather than aggressively pursuing portal acquisitions, they've concentrated on refining their existing roster - a clear indication of their confidence in the team already assembled. While losing a depth player is never ideal, it hasn't significantly impacted their championship aspirations. This conservative approach reflects a program already operating at a high level, prioritizing cohesion and established chemistry. Grade: B+

Texas A&M University: The Aggies find themselves in a more complex position. The departure of guard Tyrece Radford, a significant contributor to their backcourt, represents a tangible setback, highlighting a vulnerability in their depth. However, Texas A&M's response - securing a skilled forward - demonstrates a targeted approach to addressing specific needs. Their strategy isn't about wholesale roster transformation, but rather filling crucial gaps and augmenting their existing strengths. Grade: B

Texas Tech University: Arguably the biggest winner in this regional portal shuffle is Texas Tech. The Red Raiders landed Steve Freeman, a highly sought-after point guard transfer, instantly raising the ceiling of their team's potential. Freeman's scoring prowess and extensive game experience promise to provide a significant boost to Tech's backcourt, potentially propelling them deeper into the NCAA tournament conversation. This acquisition screams ambition and a willingness to invest heavily in immediate improvement. Grade: A+

The Rebuilding Programs: Risk and Reward

SMU: The Mustangs are making a concerted effort to elevate their program, employing an aggressive portal strategy that carries both opportunity and risk. Their acquisition of multiple players with potential indicates a desire for a significant and rapid improvement. The key to their success will be the seamless integration of these new players and their ability to quickly mesh with the existing team dynamic. A roster overhaul of this magnitude is a gamble, but one SMU seems willing to take. Grade: B-

Baylor University: Baylor's portal activity mirrors their overall program philosophy: steady, incremental improvement. They've added a handful of players who appear to be a good fit for their system, subtly addressing areas of need. The Bears aren't chasing headlines; they're building a program through consistent effort and focused acquisitions. Grade: C+

TCU: TCU's approach echoes Baylor's, characterized by cautious and targeted additions. They've attempted to address depth concerns, but have avoided any high-profile splashes. This suggests a more patient approach to roster building, prioritizing stability over immediate gains. Grade: C

Oklahoma University: The Sooners are clearly aiming to elevate their competitiveness within the Big 12 conference, actively using the portal to target players who can contribute significantly in scoring and rebounding. This proactive approach indicates a desire to close the gap with the conference's elite teams. Grade: B

North Texas: Similar to Oklahoma, North Texas is leveraging the portal to improve its overall talent level and build a more competitive roster. Their focus appears to be on acquiring players with potential, laying the groundwork for future success. Grade: C

Looking Ahead:

The transfer portal remains a disruptive force in college basketball, continually reshaping team dynamics and competitive landscapes. The teams outlined above represent a range of strategies, from the measured stability of Texas to the ambitious overhaul of SMU. The coming months will reveal which programs have successfully navigated the portal's complexities and positioned themselves for sustained success.


Read the Full Dallas Morning News Article at:
[ https://www.dallasnews.com/sports/texas-tech-red-raiders/2026/01/16/transfer-portal-winners-losers-texas-texas-am-texas-tech-smu-baylor-tcu-oklahoma-north-texas/ ]