N※N

Decoding the ISU Judging System: A Breakdown

  //sports-competition.news-articles.net/content/2 .. decoding-the-isu-judging-system-a-breakdown.html
  Published in Sports and Competition on Friday, February 13th 2026 at 22:32 GMT by Sporting News
      Locales: UNITED STATES, JAPAN

Decoding the ISU Judging System

The IJS, implemented in 2004, moved away from the subjective '6.0' system to a more detailed, component-based evaluation. A skater's total score is the sum of two key elements:

• Technical Element Score (TES): This is the quantitative side of scoring, focused on the execution of jumps, spins, step sequences, and other technical elements. Each element is assigned a base value reflecting its inherent difficulty. Judges then assess the quality of the execution, awarding a Grade of Execution (GOE) ranging from -5 to +5. A flawless quad axel, for example, will receive a high GOE, significantly boosting the TES. Conversely, a flawed attempt will incur point deductions.
• Program Component Score (PCS): This represents the artistic impression of the program. Judges evaluate five components - skating skills, transitions, performance, composition, and interpretation. Each component is scored on a scale from 0 to 10, factoring in the skater's technique, artistry, and connection to the music. A compelling performance that captivates the audience and demonstrates strong artistry can significantly elevate the PCS.

The Numbers Game: Estimating the Winning Score

Predicting the exact score needed for Olympic gold is a complex task, inherently dependent on the performances of competing skaters. However, we can glean valuable insights from past Olympic results. Analyzing historical data provides a reasonable benchmark.

• Beijing 2022: Nathan Chen, representing the US, secured gold with a total score of 333.43. This was a dominant performance that set a high bar for future competitions.
• Pyeongchang 2018: Hanyu Yuzuru of Japan claimed victory with 310.43 points, demonstrating that while scores are increasing, the range for gold remains relatively consistent.

Currently, Malinin's average free skate score hovers around 290 points. This suggests a significant gap between his current performance level and the scores necessary to contend for gold. To realistically challenge for the top spot in Milan, Malinin likely needs to surpass the 340-point mark. This is not an insurmountable feat, but it necessitates a substantial improvement in both technical execution and artistic presentation.

The Competition and the Path to Gold

Malinin isn't operating in a vacuum. Shoma Uno of Japan is a formidable rival, consistently achieving scores in the low-to-mid 330s. Other skaters are also rapidly improving, pushing the boundaries of the sport. Malinin will need to deliver a virtually flawless performance, maximizing both TES and PCS, to outscore these contenders. He needs to consistently land the quad axel and demonstrate a level of artistry and emotional connection that resonates with the judges. A minor error could prove devastating in such a closely contested field.

Malinin's Trajectory and Future Prospects The good news for Team USA is that Malinin has demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory throughout the current season. He's refining his technique, improving his consistency, and showcasing a growing maturity in his performance. If he continues this progress, focusing on both technical precision and artistic expression, he possesses a genuine opportunity to not only compete for but also secure the gold medal in Milan, finally ending the decades-long drought for American men's figure skating and cementing his place as a legend in the sport.